spam, spam, spam,  privacy, security & spam

"Two years from now, spam will be solved.” Bill Gates, Jan, 2004.

For network-based spam-fighting at the enterprise level, check out TurnTide anti-spam router

10 things companies should do about spam

3 steps to protect corporate email and online identity

More about phishing and brand theft (pdf)

Why it's okay to say EMAIL CAN BE SPAM but it's dumb to say email can be SPAM

For lots of statistics about the spam problem, click

What is Phishing?

Have you ever received an email about problems with an account at a bank or other institution, but you don't actually have an account at that institution? If so, you have been "phished." You have also been phished if you do have an account at that institution. There is not much you can do to stop these messages appearing, apart from use a spam filter (which may not catch all of them). What you don't want to do is get caught by the phisher.

Phishing is a technique used by strangers to "fish" for information about you, information that you would not normally disclose to a stranger, such as your bank account number, PIN, and other personal identifiers such as Social Security number. These messages often contain company logos that look legitimate and use flowery or legalistic language about improving security by confirming your identity details.

The best thing to do with these messages is delete them. The worst thing to do is respond to them. We know of no reputable institution that uses email to request changes or updates to confidential account information.

Although the people sending these phishing messages are trying to get personal information, they are not targeting you personally. They send millions of these messages a day and have no idea whether or not the recipients have accounts at the institution named in the message. Indeed, this type of mismatch is the easiest way to spot a phishing message.

However, if the phisher gets lucky and you do happen to have an account at the institution named in the message, or the message is generic--see below) then things get a little trickier.

For example, you are more likely to pay attention to a message that appears, often quite convincingly, to come from your bank. So let us repeat, we know of no reputable institution that uses email to request changes or updates to confidential account information. Delete the message. Do NOT click on any links in the message.

If you cannot resist looking at email about an account problem here are some of the clues that the message is bogus (note that we are NOT implying that messages which lack these clues are therefore legitimate):

1. Has a deceptive link

Most phishing messages make an effort to look like they are legitimate, for example, by using logos and graphics stolen from the web site of the target bank. All phishing messages we have seen also include a link for you to go to a web site to provide the data the phisher is trying to steal. However, this link is typically disguised.

For example, the link might be long and complicated and include the name of the bank but actually not take you to the bank's web site. Alternatively, the link may appear to be plain and simple text but in fact it is html-coded to go somewhere else. Some email programs, such as recent versions of Eudora, will warn you of this deception and show you the real link when you place your mouse over the link text.

As you can see, this is tricky stuff and not something that inexperienced users should mess with. Just delete the message and move on.

2. Says you must change your PIN and/or password

This is not something that legitimate companies currently do via email, partly because email is so unreliable and prone to spoofing and other security problems.

No security update to a banking web site is going to involve you logging into your account to reset it or prevent it being suspended. Ignore these messages and move on.

3. Bad spelling and grammar

Whoever thought those tedious grammar lessons could be so useful? Believe it or not, bad grammar, spelling, and even faulty logic can be the fastest way to spot bogus email. Consider this example:

Therefore, if you are the rightful holder of the account please fill in the form below so that we can check your identy.

There is a telling typo here (identy for identity) and the logic is hopeless. Think about it, why would a bank send an email to someone if they were not sure they were the "rightful holder of the account." Again, this is not how real companies do business today, so just move on.

Generic Example

Generic account warnings are particularly nasty. They are one way that phishing attacks try to get around the problem of not knowing where the victim (you) has an account. For example, all bank accounts in America are insured by an institution called FDIC. So someone created a particularly nasty attack that preyed on this fact, potentially snagging anyone with a bank account.

You can see the message by clicking this link: FDIC Patriot Act.

We also have a picture of the bogus web site to which the link in this message leads. Note that it looks as though it is www.fdic.org, but it is not. Click here for a view of the bogus site.

Go to this page for several more examples of phishing.

The Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) has a large archive of attacks, as well as news on the latest attacks, at the APWG web site.

Note: All trademarks displayed are the property of their respective owners. Images may include copyright material and are displayed for educational purposes. Email users should think twice before replying or responding to any message requesting or referring to personal information such as user name, password, social security number or bank account.

Trusted Email Open Standard
TEOS is a practical roadmap to a spam-free future. Co-authored by Stephen Cobb and his colleagues at ePrivacy Group, endorsed by several consumer groups, TEOS offers enormous benefits for everyone who uses email. Find out why your ISP should back TEOS today.

Trusted Sender
Using patent-pending technology that is available today, Trusted Sender is one thing every company can implement right now to fight back against spam, email fraud, and corporate identity spoofing. It could even help government agencies such as Homeland Security protect against cyber-terrorism tactics like an email disinformation campaign aimed at hampering first responders.

The Multi-Billion Dollar Corporate Spam Threat
(and we are not talking about the cost of filtering)
Spammers regularly take the identities of leading companies in vain and perpetrate fraud in their name. Unless company executives take steps to help consumers distinguish legitimate email from fraudulent spam, they could face some tough consequences.

The SpamSquelcher Press Release: 2/11/03
Announcing a product developed by ePrivacy Group to prevent spammers from stealing network resources from companies and Internet Service Providers. Very cool stuff because it won't block legitimate messages, but it will save companies money (when you read the claims we are making for this product, you might be tempted to think it's just marketing hype: it's not—this really is an important new development in the war on spam).

The AES Trusted Sender Press Release: 2/04/03
A landmark in the development of Trusted Sender, which uses ePrivacy Group's Postiva technology. The Trusted Sender program has the potential to eventually render spam irrelevant.

Press release on the New York spam verdict: 1/24/03
My reaction to a potentially landmark decision in a spam case in New York.

Cobb article on the economics of spam: February, 2003
Until the "parasitic economics" of spam are reversed, spam will continue to grow (it is currently growing at 15 percent per month, at least) to the point where it overwhelms legitimate email. Understanding spam-e-nomics is the first step to solving the problem and reversing the trend


Updated 2007, by webbloke at cobbsblog.com, © Stephen Cobb, 2001-2007